Statement: Channel 4 Big Brother
04/07
18 January 2007
Speaking today about the treatment of Shilpa Shetty in the Big
Brother house, Metropolitan Police Authority magistrate member Aneeta Prem said:
“I am appalled by the behaviour of some participants on Big
Brother and equally appalled by the lack of action being taken by
Channel 4 to address the issue.
“I have received numerous calls and emails in relation to
incidents of racism Shilpa Shetty has been subjected to and will
be contacting colleagues at Hertfordshire Police Authority, whose
jurisdiction the Big Brother House falls under, to voice my
concerns and those of the public.
“The Macpherson Inquiry Report defines a racist incident as any
incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any
other person, a stance that is supported by the spirit of the Race
Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, and Section 22 of the Public Order
Act 1986 states that the use of threatening, abusive or insulting
words or behaviour can result in prosecution, especially, as is
being demonstrated in Big Brother, when this is linked to racial
insults, harassment and bullying.
“It is clear to me then that, with over 20,000 people having
reportedly made complaints about the behaviour they have observed,
and the broadcast behaviour of certain Big Brother participants
towards her, the treatment Shilpa Shetty has received constitutes
racism.
“For some people to claim it amounts to no more than school
playground bullying simply condones this unacceptable behaviour.
We should not forget that bullying in schools, work or in any
other place is corrosive and damaging, both for the individual on
the receiving end and the wider community. In the most tragic
instances, young people have been known to commit suicide
following sustained bullying at school.”
Commenting on the reluctance of Channel 4 to make a quick
intervention, Aneeta continued:
“If Channel 4 continues to allow the behaviour, comments and
use of language we have seen to continue unchecked the company
would be seen to be condoning bullying and racism. In my view, the
behaviour we have seen illustrates the latent racist attitudes
that exist within some sections of society.”
Aneeta continued that, as a British Indian woman descended from
Himachal Pradesh in northern India, she has experienced both
blatant and covert racism in Britain:
“I am not shocked by what is happening on Big Brother but I am
very saddened. If people put themselves before the public as role
models, they have a duty in my opinion to portray positive values
of our multi-cultural society.
“I and members of the London Race Hate Crime Forum are
extremely concerned about the effect this will have on children
and young people, both in terms of influencing their behaviour
and, especially for those from black and minority ethnic
communities, the treatment they experience in our schools.
“The way forward is to tackle ignorance and intolerance by
improving education and awareness in the community and in our
schools. We all have a responsibility to challenge racist bigoted
comments that are harmful.”
Peter Herbert,
chair of the London Race Hate Crime Forum said:
“This behaviour must not be condoned by Channel 4 doing nothing
and using the excuse that up until recently there has been no
overt racism. The programme owes a duty of care to all its
contestants and should not allow participants to be racially
abused in a cynical attempt to boost ratings.
“The London Race Hate Crime Forum, the Police, local
authorities and other partner agencies have been working hard to
positively address issues of race and other hate crimes. The Forum
wants to send out the strong message that behaviour such as we
have witnessed on Big Brother is totally unacceptable in our
society.”
Notes to editors
1. Aneeta Prem, is an magistrate MPA member and link member for
the London boroughs of Havering, Newham and Redbridge.
Further media information
For further information, please contact the
MPA press office